Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Dorian Grey Article

This week’s reading, “The Gay Artist as a Tragic Hero in The Picture of Dorian Gray” by Henry M. Alley, was insightful and informative. Alley’s perspective on the homo-erotic subtext of Dorian Gray does much to put the story line and its historical references and influences into a meaningful context.

The relevance of terms like “hamartia” and “dandy” to Dorian Gray become quite apparent upon brief investigation. Hamartia is defined simply as “tragic flaw” on Dictionary.com; Wikipedia offers a more in-depth explanation of the term:

This form of drawing emotion from the audience is a staple of the Greek tragedies. In Greek tragedy, stories that contain a character with a hamartia often follow a similar blueprint. The hamartia, as stated, is seen as an error in judgment or unwitting mistake is applied to the actions of the hero. For example, the hero might attempt to achieve a certain objective X; by making an error in judgment, however, the hero instead achieves the opposite of X, with disastrous consequences.

This I think quite directly applies to Dorian Gray in the form of the character Basil. The assertion made, by Alley and others cited by him, that Basil is the principle hero of Dorian Gray is convincing to me and would seem to be quite obvious, seeing as Basil alone mantains an essence of goodness and goodwill throughout the story, whereas Lord Henry’s influence is a corrupting factor, and Dorian’s presence to all those around him is toxic. Basil has a good in his heart which is fitting of a prototypical hero, but the “error in judgement or unwitting mistake” which defines the artist is of course his all-pervasive and all-powerful love and longing for Dorian, whose unavailability and calamitous influence on those around him tears at Basil as much as his own inability to express and pursue his heart’s desire with conviction and success.

The term “dandy” is also relevant to Wilde’s novel. It has been noted that Lord Henry’s uncle refers to him as a “dandy;” Wikipedia offers us this working definition of the term:

A dandy (also known as a beau, or gallant) is a man who places particular importance upon physical appearance, refined language, and leisurely hobbies, pursued with the appearance of nonchalance in a cult of Self. Historically, especially in late 18th- and early 19th-century Britain, a dandy, who was self-made, often strove to imitate an aristocratic style of life despite coming from a middle class background.

This of course describes Basil (to a degree, but especially in how he covets physical appearances), Lord Henry (he of the influential yellow book and it’s guidance along in the “cult of Self”), and most of all Dorian Gray. Gray encapsulates the spirit of the dandy in it’s darkest manifestation, where appearance becomes not only everything, but a means by which to hide true darkness and malevolence. Dorian Gray is very much the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing, maintaining a façade of regal sophistication and dashing debonairness while beneath the surface festers a conniving, self-serving hedonist egomaniac.

I found The Portrait of Dorian Gray to be maybe our most interesting and pleasurable reading assignment thus far in class. Alley’s insights into the text, and especially his understanding of the relationship between Gray as a novel and Oscar Wilde’s own real-life proclivities, proved to be quite fascinating and, I think, helpful in gaining a more meaningful understanding of the book’s message.

5 comments:

  1. Hi Ann,

    I also did some research on the term hamartia, for this weeks blog. And I also connected the term with the character Basil Hallward. You interpreted somethings differently than I originally did but I liked looking at your perspective on things. You said,

    “The assertion made, by Alley and others cited by him, that Basil is the principle hero of Dorian Gray is convincing to me and would seem to be quite obvious, seeing as Basil alone mantains an essence of goodness and goodwill throughout the story, whereas Lord Henry’s influence is a corrupting factor, and Dorian’s presence to all those around him is toxic. Basil has a good in his heart which is fitting of a prototypical hero, but the “error in judgement or unwitting mistake” which defines the artist is of course his all-pervasive and all-powerful love and longing for Dorian, whose unavailability and calamitous influence on those around him tears at Basil as much as his own inability to express and pursue his heart’s desire with conviction and success.”

    I agree that Lord Henry was a bad influence on Dorian. In my analysis, I tried to make sense of the term hamartia and it led me to start thinking about Basil as a bad influence as well. I thought this way because the term hamartia can be described as like you said, “an error in judgment.” I started thinking that maybe Basil was judged as the “goody good” therefore he wasn’t a bad influence on Dorian. Then after studying the term hamaria and the “error and judgment” I began to think maybe Basil does have more of an influence on Dorian than people realize. If you think about it Dorian is so concerned about Basil seeing the picture after it has changed. Maybe this is a symbol of the homoerotic love because Dorian is afraid to disappoint Basil.

    You analysis made me think that maybe it was Dorian who is suppose to be seen as a bad influence on Basil. It’s really kind of interesting to think of all these perspectives. Thanks for your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Ann,

    Your blog does a great job of explaining two terms that characterize some of the most important factors of the story, the flaws of the characters and the disguises they used to cover them up.

    I completely agree with your perspective that Basil Hallward’s hamartia was his blind devotion and love for Dorian. This “tragic flaw” leads to his other mistake of being submissive and letting Lord Henry take Dorian under his wing and corrupt him with his influence. I understand that it was not exactly his fault what happened to Dorian, and that the blame really rests upon Dorian for being so susceptible to Lord Henry and his Hedonistic ideals. Nevertheless, with Basil’s love and devotion to Dorian I feel that he falls short in trying to protect Dorian from the corruption of his soul. Apart from about two good speeches to Dorian about his bad behavior, it seems that Basil spends most of his time trying to idolize Dorian as this altruistic man and not the corrupt being that he is, blinded by his aesthetic vision of the man in the portrait. Basil stood idly by and let Dorian and Lord Henry become acquaintances, knowing full well what Lord Henry’s influence would do to the innocent man. He turns his head away from what he knew was to ensue from the friendship, and as a result turned his back to Dorian.

    I love your description of Dorian as “very much the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing, maintaining a façade of regal sophistication and dashing debonairness while beneath the surface festers a conniving, self-serving hedonist egomaniac.” This description really dehumanizes Dorian and captures the true essence of his cunning and hideous being.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ann,

    I've noticed that a lot of people originally looked at Basil as simply a 'good guy', mostly free of guilt for the way that things ended with Dorian. Unfortunately we all over look the fact that Basil is just as guilty as Lord Henry. And that is on top of the fact that Dorian very well may never have met Lord Henry if it weren't for Basil Hallward. However it was both Dorian and Basil that were victims of hamartia, making their errors in judgment that eventually led to their eerily similar deaths. I'm pretty certain that this was done intentionally of course.

    I have to agree that Dorian Gray has been my favorite reading assignment so far, even though Carmilla was definitely a pleasant surprise, and I'm amazed at how straight forward Alley's analysis helped with understandings. I also enjoyed the references to other literary works like those of Aristotle and Shakespeare. I was also pleasantly surprised to see the reference to Marlowe's Doctor Faustius in there as well. However no matter how many literary comparisons we make they don't have the same impact that Dorian Gray has for us. I'm not sure if it's the general moral implications or if it's the background that we have on Wilde himself that gives us this better understanding.

    WS

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ann,

    You brought up some interesting points that I almost forgot about when reading this novel. The term “dandy” was not something I was really familiar with except for the negative connotation I had heard with it as describing someone who was gay. You quoted Wikipedia’s definition as, “A dandy (also known as a beau, or gallant) is a man who places particular importance upon physical appearance, refined language, and leisurely hobbies, pursued with the appearance of nonchalance in a cult of Self.” I found this interesting since this, to me, sounded like the current definition of a “metro-sexual” in today’s society.

    Another term that I found really odd but interesting was from the novel, “He had been a macaroni of the eighteenth century, and the friend in his youth, of Lord Ferrars” (Wilde 122). The term “macaroni” struck me as so odd since I had no idea what it meant. In reading the definition in the notes stating that, it was someone who was somewhat of a trend-setter and was a pre-cursor to the term “dandy”, I found myself chuckling to myself for a very silly reason. In my head I sang the song “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and realized that not only does this childhood rhyme use the word ‘dandy”; it also talks about sticking a feather in a hat and calling it “macaroni”. I know this is ridiculous and not very critical in an analysis of the novel and critique, but I definitely learned what that nursery rhyme was talking about. Thanks for reminding me about that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Celtic Dreamer,

    I think your reference to "Yankee Doodle" is apt. I wiki'd the song, and came up with this:

    As a term Doodle first appeared in the early seventeenth century,[4] and is thought to derive from the Low German dudel or dödel, meaning "fool" or "simpleton". The Macaroni wig was an extreme fashion in the 1770s and became contemporary slang for foppishness.[5] The implication of the verse was therefore probably that the Yankees were so unsophisticated that they thought simply sticking a feather in a cap would make them the height of fashion.[6]

    I think what's applicable here is that it's *style* and not substance that matters when it comes to the dandy. Ann writes, "Gray encapsulates the spirit of the dandy in it’s darkest manifestation, where appearance becomes not only everything, but a means by which to hide true darkness and malevolence."
    While I think this is a very useful way of thinking about the dandies in the novel, I wonder if the "darkness" comes from pure materialism. The materialism does not "hide" anything, but is in itself a malevolent force. As I read _Picture_ this time around, I began noting the places in which Lord Henry pontificates on life and great feeling. I find this ironic because I would argue that Lord Henry is all talk--all style--but little substance. For instance, on page 19 he states, "I believe that if one man were to live out his life fully and completely, were to give form to every feeling, expression to every thought, reality to every dream--I believe that the world would again such a fresh impulse of joy that we would forget all the maladies of medievalism, and return to the Hellenic ideal." This statement seems so far from Lord Henry's nature, which, to me, is cold, distant, and ever-observing. He often *says* things about "truly" living, but doesn't seem to really mean them at all. As Lady Agatha says on page 35, "Don't mind [Lord Henry]...He never means anything he says." What happens to meaning when the medium IS the message? When there is nothing deeper than appearances? Is there a certain nihilism to this novel that is relative to the kind of "darkness" about which Anna speaks?

    ReplyDelete